Tuition fee EU nationals (2025/2026)
Tuition fee non-EU nationals (2025/2026)
Programme Structure for 2025/2026
| Curricular Courses | Credits | |
|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | ||
|
Leadership and Team Management for Executives
3.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 3.0 |
|
Strategy for Executives
3.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 3.0 |
|
Finance for Executives
3.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 3.0 |
|
Marketing Management for Executives
3.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 3.0 |
|
Accounting for Executives
3.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 3.0 |
|
Operations Management for Executives
3.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 3.0 |
|
Programming in Python for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Data Science | 6.0 |
|
Big Data and Business Analytics
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Data Science | 6.0 |
|
Taxation for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Accounting | 6.0 |
|
Management Control for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Accounting | 6.0 |
|
Capital Budgeting for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Finance | 6.0 |
|
Financial Markets for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Finance | 6.0 |
|
Internationalization Strategies for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Management | 6.0 |
|
Digital Transformation Strategy for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Management | 6.0 |
|
Sales Management for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Marketing | 6.0 |
|
Digital Marketing for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Marketing | 6.0 |
|
Project Management for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Operations | 6.0 |
|
Supply Chain Management for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Operations | 6.0 |
|
Business Communication for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Human Resources | 6.0 |
|
Negotiation for Executives
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Thematic Areas > Human Resources | 6.0 |
|
Applied Project Work in Management
30.0 ECTS
|
Final Work | 30.0 |
|
Applied Project Work in Management
30.0 ECTS
|
Final Work | 30.0 |
Leadership and Team Management for Executives
To know the main leadership approaches and to understand its influence to develop effective and adaptive teams in organizational context.
ProgramP1. Different perspectives on leadership: approaches centered on leader and on the leader - follower interactions.
P2. The key components and processes of team effectiveness
P3. Team leadership
P4. Enhancing team learning and adaptation
1) Periodical evaluation: individual written final test (60%)and group work (40%). Requires a minimum of 10 points in the final classification and at least 60% of attendance to classes.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
Scale: 0-20 points.
Salas,E., Goodwin,G., & Burke,C. (2009). Team effectiveness in complex organizations. New York: Psychology Press.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zaccaro, S.J., Rittman, A.L., & Marks, M.A. (2001). Team Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451- 483.
Yammarino, F. (2013). Leadership: Past, presente, and future. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 149 -155.
Santos, C. M., Passos, A. M., Uitdewilligen, S., & Nübold, A. (2016). Shared temporal cognitions as substitute for temporal leadership: An analysis of their effects on temporal conflict and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.002
Maynard, M. T., Kennedy, D. M., Sommer, S. A., & Passos, A. M. (2015). Team Cohesion: A Theoretical Consideration of Its Reciprocal Relationships within the Team Adaptation Nomological Network. In E. Salas, W. B. Vessey, & A. X. Estrada (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 17, 83?111. doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017005
Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes, Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. (2014). Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87 (2), 414-436. DOI:10.1111/joop.12057
Strategy for Executives
LG 1 - To develop some of the concepts underlying the strategic management process and understand the ways different theoretical perspectives approach this process.
LG 2 - To understand and apply the concept of dynamic capabilities and its approach to strategy
LG 3 - To introduce some of the concepts underlying the development of business strategies
LG 4 - To understand the importance of implementation and control in the process of strategic management
LG 5 - To develop critical thinking
LG 6 - To have autonomy to plan their own learning processes in order to deep their knowledge in this area of study.
1. Fundamentals of strategy
2. The strategic management process: New trends
3. Internal analysis of the organisation
4. External environment analysis
5. Business Strategies
6. Strategy Implementation
7. Strategic Control
Option 1 (Continuous Assessment - Class Attendance of at least 60%)
i. Individual Assignment 50%
ii. Group Assignment 50%
To successfully complete the course, students must obtain a weighted average of 10 points or more (0-20 scale), with at least 10 points in each component of the continuous assessment.
Option 2 (Final Exam)
To pass: 10 or more points
Stadler, C., Hautz, J., Matzler, K. & Friedrich von den Eichen, S. (2021) Open Strategy: Mastering Disruption from Outside the C-Suite. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pearce, J. & Robison, R. (2013) Strategic Management, 13th Edition, MacGraw-hill Higher Education.
Grant, R. (2018) Contemporary Strategy Analysis (10th edition), Wiley.
Barney, J. & Hesterley S. (2019) Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases, 6th Edition, Pearson.
Teece, D., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal , 18(7), pp. 509-533.
Riviere, M. & Suder, G. (2016) Perspectives on strategic internationalisation: developing capabilities for renewal. International Business Review, 25(4), pp. 847-858.
Prange, C. & Verdier, S. (2011) Dynamic Capabilities, internationalisation processes and performance. Journal of World Business, 46(1), pp. 126-133.
Gebauer, H. (2011) Exploring the Contribution of management innovation to the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), pp. 1238-1250.
Eisenhardt, K. & Martin, J. (2000) Dynamic Capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10-11), pp. 1105-1121.
Cardeal, N. & António, N. (2012) Valuable, rare, inimitable resources and organisation (VRIO) or valuable, rare, inimitable resources (VRI) capabilities: what leads to competitive advantage? African Journal of Business Management, Volume 6, nº 37, pp. 10159-10170.
Breznik, L. & D. Hisrich, R. (2014) Dynamic Capabilities vs. innovation capability: are there related? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), pp. 368-384.
Finance for Executives
At the end of the course, students should be able to:
1. Explain the main concepts of time value of money and be able to compare cash flows with different maturities;
2. To describe the concept of business profitability, liquidity and solvency and to compute and analyze the most relevant economic/financial ratios and indicators;
3. To understand and compute de concept of working capital and liquidity indicator and to link it with the firm's financial condition
4. Use the fundamental techniques of capital budgeting evaluation;
1. Time value of money;
2. Financial analysis;
3. Economic analysis and value added;
4. Capital budgeting;
1) Periodical evaluation: individual work 60% and group work -40%.
Requires a minimum of 10 points in the final classification and at least 60% of attendance to classes;
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval;
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
Scale: 0-20 points.
Gomes Mota, A., Barroso, C., Soares, H. e Laureano, L., "Introdução às Finanças - Fundamentos de Finanças com Casos Práticos Resolvidos e Propostos", Edições Sílabo, Lisboa,
Gomes Mota, A. e Custódio, C., "Finanças da Empresa", Booknomics.
Damodaran - Corporate Finance, Wiley
Brealey, Myers e Allen - Princípios de Finanças Empresariais, McGraw Hill
Marketing Management for Executives
1. The course presents a balanced theoretical/practical approach to the critical understanding of Marketing topics and issues.
2. We aim to critically approach marketing mix management with a focus on the role of brands (product, services and corporate).
3. Develop an understanding of the brand management process and its impact on value aggregation to goods and services.
4.To acquire competencies in the critical evaluation of fundamental brand management and corporate reputation tools and concepts.
5. Understanding all of the above in the context of organisational and national competitiveness in the global economy.
To promote a deep understanding of marketing´s key concepts, tools and relationship with other managerial functions.
Key contents:
1. "The Customer-Oriented Business"
2. STP
3. Brand Management, Innovation
4. Corporate Reputation Management
1) Periodical evaluation: individual test (50%); group essay(50%). Requires a minimum grade of 10 points, attendance to classes of at least 60%.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
Scale: 0-20 points.
Lecture notes provided.
- Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L.(2012) Marketing Management, 14th. Edition. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Accounting for Executives
OA1. Develop an integrated view of financial statements.
OA2. Understand the content of each of the financial statements.
OA3. Develop ability to analyze the effect of business decisions on financial statements.
P1. Integrated view of the financial statements.
P2. Structure and content of each of the financial statements.
P3. Effect of the main business decisions in the financial statements.
In addition to strict compliance with the program regulation, the periodical evaluation method requires a minimum class attendance of 60% and:
- An assignment (individual or in group) with a weight of 50%;
- An individual test, with a weight of 50% and a minimum grade of 10 points.
Alternatively, the final exam, similarly to phase two exams, will account for 100% of the final grade, disregarding the periodical assessment component.
Jones, M, 2014, 'Financial Accounting'. John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Lourenço et al., 2018, Fundamentos de contabilidade financeira: teoria e casos, Edições Sílabo.
Operations Management for Executives
Develop the main reasoning on how to manage an operation: Design, Plan, Develop and Control an Operation
ProgramP1. How to Design an Operation: Core fundamentals of layout
P2. How to Plan an Operation: Core fundamentals of capacity and stocks
P3. How to develop an Operation: core fundamentals of operations quality and strategy
P4. How to Control an Operation: core KPI's
1) Periodical evaluation: individual written work (70%) and group work (30%). Requires a minimum of 10 points in the final classification and at least 60% of attendance to classes.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
Scale: 0-20 points.
Operations Management, Krajewski, Malhotra & Ritzman, 2015 (Pearson)
Operations Management, Slack & Brandon-Jones, 2019 (Pearson)
Programming in Python for Executives
LG1: Understand the fundamentals of programming in Python.
LG2: Learn the syntax in writing functions and scripts, and how to organize data efficiently.
LG3: Learn how to apply Python to day-to-day business activities.
P1: Introduction to Python
P2: Variable types and basic operations
P3: Loops
P4: Conditional statements
P5: Functions and classes
P6: Importing and working with external data
P7: Practical applications
1) Periodical evaluation: case solving/work, in group/individual (50%) and an individual written final test (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in individual evaluation, attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
McKinney, W. ? Python for Data Analysis: Data Wrangling with Pandas, NumPy, and IPython, O?Reilly Media, 2nd Edition, 2017.
Beazley, D. e B. Jones ? Python Cookbook, O?Reilly Media, 3rd Edition, 2013.
Big Data and Business Analytics
LG1. Provide a general overview of the different data science techniques and their use and limitations in management.
LG2. Students must be able to use the R/RStudio program.
P1. Introduction to Predictive Modelling
P2. Fitting model to data
P3. Models? statistical evaluation
P4. Forecasting
1) Periodical evaluation: case solving/work, in group/individual (50%) and an individual written final test (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in individual evaluation, attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Wiley, M. e Wiley, J. F. (2019), Advanced R Statistical Programming and Data Models, Springer
Provost, F. e Fawcett, T. (2013), Data Science for Business, O?Reilly
Curto, J. D. (2017), Protenciar os negócios? A estatística dá uma ajuda!, 2ª edição, Edição de Autor
Taxation for Executives
LG1 - To understand the relationship between accounting and taxation.
LG2 - Understand the importance of the income tax effects in the management of companies.
LG3 - Increase the knowledge concerning the determination of taxable income of companies, in order to make a correct tax management.
LG4 - Knowing the typology of tax crimes and typology of offenses, and know the penalties and leniency applicable.
P1. The taxation of companies profits and the Portuguese Constitution.
P2. Microeconomics effects of taxation.
P3. The tax obligation structure.
P4. Relationship between taxation and accounting.
P5. From accounting profit to tax income.
P6. General Regime of Tax Offences.
1) Periodical evaluation: individual written final test (100%). Requires a minimum of 10 points in the final classification and at least 2/3 of attendance to classes,.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Constituição da República Portuguesa, Lei Geral Tributária, Regime Geral das Infrações Tributárias, Código do IRC, Estatuto dos Benefícios Fiscais
Impostos Teoria Geral, Américo Fernando Brás Carlos, Almedina, 3ª edição, 2014. Guia dos Impostos em Portugal-2018, A. Brás Carlos, Irene Abreu, João Durão, Emília Pimenta, Quid Juris, 2019
Management Control for Executives
LG1. To understand the methodologies and criteria of evaluation performance
LG2. Structure a management performance system that improves individual and global performance
P1. Management information
P2. EVA and value management by residual income
P3. Responsibility centers and performance evaluation
P4. Global performance: balanced scorecard and tableau de bord
1) Periodical evaluation: case solving/work, in group/individual (40%) and an individual written final test (60%). Requires a minimum grade of 7,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 2/3, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Jordan, H., Neves, J.C., e Rodrigues, J.A. (2015). O Controlo de Gestão - ao Serviço da Estratégia e dos Gestores. Áreas Editora.
Merchant, K. A., e Van der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management Control Systems. Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Prentice Hall.
Capital Budgeting for Executives
LG1. Develop, debate and apply the main components of capital budgeting.
LG2. Present Excel as the main tool for capital budgeting
P1. Stages and Components of Capital Budgeting, Selection Criteria. Inflation Impact.
P2. Risk and Sensitivity Analysis
P3. Projects with Debt and other Sources of Funding
P4. Valuation Special Cases
1) Periodical evaluation: case solving/work, in group/individual (50%) and an individual written final test (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Corporate Finance ? Ross, Westerfield & Jaffe ? 12th ed. - 2018 (McGraw-Hill)
Principles of Corporate Finance ? Brealey, Myers & Allen ? 13th ed. 2019 (McGraw-Hill)
Financial Markets for Executives
LG1: Develop and apply the main concepts underlying the analysis, valuation and risk management of bonds and equities.
LG2: Understand and simulate the use of derivatives in financial risk management.
P1: Financial markets
P2: Bond analysis and valuation
P3: Stock analysis and valuation
P4: Derivatives and financial risk management
1) Periodical evaluation: case solving/work, in group/individual (50%) and an individual written final test (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element.
attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Hull, J. ? Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, Pearson, 10th Edition, 2018.
Martellini, L., P. Priaulet e S. Priaulet ? Fixed-Income Securities ? Valuation, Risk Management & Portfolio Strategies, Wiley Finance, 2003.
Garbade, K. D. ? Fixed Income Analytics, The MIT Press, 1996.
Fabozzi, F. ? Bond Markets, Analysis, and Strategies, Pearson, 9th Edition, 2015.
Internationalization Strategies for Executives
LG1. 1.Discuss and apply their understanding of what factors determine the success of firms in global business environment.
LG2. 5.Identify, analyze and select different markets and appropriate entry strategies.
P1 - Patterns of globalization
P2 - Generic international strategies
P3 - Choosing markets where to compete
P4 - Deciding on how to enter foreign countries
P5. Global Cross Cultural Management
P6. Global Marketing
P7. Global People Management
P8. Global Financial Management
1) Periodical evaluation: individual written work (50%)
and group work (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points
th edition, Palgrave MacMillan
Lasserre, P. (2018);Global Strategic Management; 4
Hofstede, Geert, (2010), Culture and organizations: Software of the mind, McGraw-Hill
Caligiuri, Paula, (2013) Cultural Agility, Jossey-Bass
Eiteman, David K., (2018), Multinational Business Finance, Pearson.
Hollensen, Svend, (2020), Global Marketing, Pearson
Digital Transformation Strategy for Executives
LG1. Understand and debate the principles of Digital Transformation
LG2. Know how to apply Digital Transformation Strategies
LG3. Identify the main digital and technological trends and know how to transform them into organizational value.
LG4. To know how to apply a Digital Transformation Maturity Analysis
P1. The 5 Principles of Digital Transformation
P2. The challenges of Big Data
P3. Digital Transformation Strategy
P4. Design Thinking
P5. Digital Transformation Maturity Models
P6. Digital and Technological Trends
P7. Case Studies of Digital Transformation
1) Periodical evaluation: work in group(40%,)Group participation (10%) and an individual written final test (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Rogers, D. L. (2016). The digital transformation playbook: Rethink your business for the digital age. Columbia University Press.
Sales Management for Executives
LG1 - Understand and apply the sales-mix tools
LG2 - Understand and apply the techniques of sales force organization and sales force management
LG3 - To develop a commercial Balanced Scorecard
Chapter I ? Sales Force Management
- Sales force functions
- Determining the number of people needed
- Sales force organization
- Sales force management
- Sales force control
- Case study
Chapter II ? Sales Management
- Sales-mix (R)?
- forecasting sales
- sales planning
- evaluating sales performance
Chapter III ? The commercial Balanced Scorecard
1) Periodical evaluation: work group(50%) and an individual written work (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
- Sales Force Management: Leadership, Innovation, Technology. Mark Johnston & Greg Marshall, 12Th Edition, 2016, McGraw-Hill.
- Selling and Sales Management. David Jobber & Geoff Lancaster. Prentice Hall.
Digital Marketing for Executives
LG1. To explore the impact of digital in transforming the marketing mix;
LG2. To practice the principles of digital marketing planning for brand communications;
LG3. To learn about best practices in digital marketing;
LG4.To understand the main metrics and KPIs related to digital strategies.
P1. Digital marketing remix: impact on product design and pricing
P2. Digital marketing remix: impact of digital on distribution channels;
P3. Digital marketing remix: impact of digital on brand communications;
P4. Preparing a digital marketing plan
Sostac planning tool adapted to digital context.
1) Continuous evaluation: case solving/work in group/individual (45%), individual participation (5%) and an individual written final test (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) 1st sitting or 2nd sitting Exam: written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
Scale: 0-20 points
-Rigby, Darrell (2011). The Future of Shopping. Harvard Business Review. Dec. 65-76.
-Holt, D. (2016). Branding in the age of social media. Harvard business review, 94(3), 13.
-Edelman, D. C., & Singer, M. (2015). Competing on customer journeys. Harvard Business Review, 93(11), 88-100.
-Barwise, P., & Meehan, S. (2010). The One Thing You Must Get Right When Building a Brand. Harvard Business Review, 88(12), 80-84.
-Chaffey D., and Smith PR. (2017). Digital Marketing Excellence ? Planning,Optimizing and Integrating Online Marketing, Routledge, 5th. Edition.
Project Management for Executives
LG1. Develop, debate and apply the main componentes of project management: planning, implementation and control; project closure.
LG2. Develop and role play the main behavioral characteristics of a project manager.
P1. Project Planning: Business Case, Project Charter, Work Breakdown Structure, Timeline, Budget and Risk
P2. Implementing and Controlling the Project
P3. Project Closure
P4. Behavioral Components of a Project
1) Periodical evaluation: group work (50%) and an individual work (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 60%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
Scale: 0-20 points.
AGILE PRACTICE GUIDE - PMI (2017)
PMBOK GUIDE ? PMI (2017)
Project Management Toolbox ? Martinelli & Milosevic, 2016 (Wiley)
Supply Chain Management for Executives
LO-1: Capacitate students with an integrated view of the supply chain and its strategies
LO-2: Capacitate students with skills to assess the main supply chain challenges using the time, cost and service quality trilogy
S1 ? Integrated view of the supply chain
S2 ? Strategies in the supply chain
S3 ? Positioning of inventory in the supply chain
S4 ? Inventory management in the supply chain
S5 ? Case Studies: Discussion and Presentation
1) Periodical evaluation: case solving/work, in group/individual (40%) and an individual written final test (60%). Requires a minimum grade of 9,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 2/3, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Carvalho, J.C. ? Logística e Gestão da Cadeia de Abastecimento, Edições Sílabo; 2017
Christopher, M. ? Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5ª edição, Pearson, 2016
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsly, P., Simchi-Levi, E. ? Designing & Managing the Supply Chain: concepts, strategies & case studies, 3ª edição, 2007
Johnsen, T.E., Moward, M., Miemczyk, J. ? Purchasing and Supply Chain Management: a sustainability perspsective, 2ª edição, Routledge, 2019
Business Communication for Executives
LG1. Identify the BC Key-factors leading to organizational success;
LG2. Design and implement strategies to create an efficient and effective BC system.
S1. Communication process ? challenging assumptions;
S2. BC challenges: Innovation and Change, Organizational Identity and Public Relations Policy;
S3. Emotion Processes and effective communication techniques;
S4. Internal and External Communication Networks;
S5. Building a BC system: strategy, factors of success and audits.
1) Periodical evaluation: individual written final test (100%). Requires a minimum attendance to classes of at least 2/3, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Downs, C. W & Adrian, A. D. (2004). Assessing Organizational Communication ? Strategic Communication Audits. New York: The Guilford Press.
Clampitt, P. G. (2016). Communicating for Managerial effectiveness ? problems, strategies, solutions. (6th ed.). LA: Sage.
Miller, K. (2012). Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes. (6th ed.). Canada: Wadworth.
Frese, M., Beimel, S. & Schoenborn, S. (2003). Action Training for Charismatic Leadership:two evaluations od studies of a commercial training module on inspirational communication of a vision. Personnel Psychology, 56, 671-697.
Falkheimer, J. (2014). The power of strategic communication in organizational development. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 6(2/3):124-133.
Negotiation for Executives
LG1. To understand, analyse and adequately apply the negotiation key elements and tools in organizational contexts;
LG2. To identify and manage strategically and operationally the main negotiation steps: preparation, interaction and agreement, in a win-win perspective
P1 - Key elements of negotiation
P2 - Strategic Approaches to Negotiation
P3 - Preparation; Relation, Process
P4 - Interests, Options, Legitimacy
P5 - Influence and Negotiation tactics
P6 - Commitments and Alternatives
1) Periodical evaluation: case solving/work, in group/individual (50%) and an individual written final test (50%). Requires a minimum grade of 7,5 points in each element (or group of elements), attendance to classes of at least 80%, and a minimum of 10 points in the final classification.
2) Exam (1st sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval.
3) Exam (2nd sitting): written test (100%), requiring minimum 10 points to get approval. Scale: 0-20 points.
Leituras disponibilizadas e slides das aulas
Falcão, P. F. (2018). Todos podemos negociar bem! Conceitos, estratégias e exemplos práticos de gestores de sucesso (3ª edição). Grupo Leya
Applied Project Work in Management
LO1: Correctly define a problem, its delimitations and subproblems in order to prepare scenarios for solutions;
LO2: Develop benchmark studies for similar problems and their solutions;
LO3: Conduct an empirical process of survey and analysis of the reality to allow better suitability and search for solutions;
LO4: Develop the proposed solutions and systematize both their presentation and the choice of what best suits the reality studied;
LO5: Argue and discuss critically for and against its position;
LO6: Communicate in writing and orally the work done and the elaboration.
The nature of the course seeks to apply competencies already acquired to achieve the goal of completing the project work. However, it allows students to be guided by the process of analysis, formulation and implementation of solution (s) for practical problems. Some of the subjects included in the course include:
CP1: Definition of the problem.
CP2: Benchmark of other realities.
CP3: Definition of the solution (s);
CP4: Writing and presentation (Preparation for defense)
The Project should be defended in public, where the following components will be evaluated:
a) technical component; b) written format and c) oral presentation and arguments, and following the norms established by Iscte. Can be developed in a group, notwithstanding the individual final questions.
Periodical evaluation: project design.
Final evaluation - monograph, structured presentation type field work.
The process, integrated, is worth 100%.
Applied Project Work in Management
LO1: Correctly define a problem, its delimitations and subproblems in order to prepare scenarios for solutions;
LO2: Develop benchmark studies for similar problems and their solutions;
LO3: Conduct an empirical process of survey and analysis of the reality to allow better suitability and search for solutions;
LO4: Develop the proposed solutions and systematize both their presentation and the choice of what best suits the reality studied;
LO5: Argue and discuss critically for and against its position;
LO6: Communicate in writing and orally the work done and the elaboration.
The nature of the course seeks to apply competencies already acquired to achieve the goal of completing the project work. However, it allows students to be guided by the process of analysis, formulation and implementation of solution (s) for practical problems. Some of the subjects included in the course include:
CP1: Definition of the problem.
CP2: Benchmark of other realities.
CP3: Definition of the solution (s);
CP4: Writing and presentation (Preparation for defense)
The Project should be defended in public, where the following components will be evaluated:
a) technical component; b) written format and c) oral presentation and arguments, and following the norms established by Iscte. Can be developed in a group, notwithstanding the individual final questions.
Periodical evaluation: project design.
Final evaluation - monograph, structured presentation type field work.
The process, integrated, is worth 100%.
